Media-Insert Communications

Media-Insert Communications

The blog of Media-Insert Communications – featuring freelance P.R. and journalism links to the work of Graham A. Jarvis.

Editing, Journalism, Copywriting, and Public Relations

  • “Councils are getting better but not quickly enough!” Says Martin Greenwood, SOCITM’s Insight Programme Manager, who believes that Councils could still do better and make their websites more accessible. Yet local authority sites have achieved an overall 25% improvement by reducing the number of technical errors across the sector. These errors may have often been caused by the failure to check and monitor the compliance of html coding.

    “Awareness has increased greatly”; he adds. He believes that SOCITM’s Better Connected reports have helped enormously, and it also down to website accessibility being “built into government targets for priority outcomes”.

    SOCITM is working with the RNIB and its own partner to help them to improve, so Greenwood speaks about website accessibility generally. Even so he reveals that the technical resilience of websites has increased significantly over the last two years. This is particularly because Council websites, he explains, “have become more transactional and more critical to local authority business, and their performance on points such as speed of opening up home page has become much more important.”

    Automated testing and monitoring products like SiteMorse, he thinks, satisfy the need and operational imperative for gathering performance information. Lastly, he concludes: “The public nature of the web makes it feasible for suppliers to provide a very useful service. Our annual Better Connected reports have highlighted the improvements being made. “

    By Graham Jarvis
    Editor and Media Services Consultant

    Email: editor@cimtech.org

  • A whitepaper by the UK’s Cabinet Office e-Government Unit, ‘Public Sector Web Accessibility Standards?’ by Tom Adams – a senior digital media consultant, highlights one of the key reasons why public organisations and even private companies should work hard to make their websites accessible to a wide variety of users, particularly those who’d normally find it hard to access the web. So what is it? You may have the best website since sliced bread but if it isn’t accessible, it isn’t useable and therefore you are likely to lose ‘customers’. It will be much harder to persuade them to come back for a second visit.

    So it’s useful to find Nottingham-based consultancy, EIBS, setting out some guidelines for what can and cannot be done to ensure that your website is not only well designed, but accessible. The company’s presentation is entitled, ‘Guidelines for creating attractive, accessible and useable websites’ and it is produced by Matt Gemmell – the company’s customer services’ director and a local e-Government standards body consultant on website accessibility.

    The presentation argues that there are a number of misconceptions about this topic area:

    · AAA compliance is just not possible;
    · Guidelines are always changing;
    · We can’t use multimedia;
    · We can’t use JavaScript or DHTML;
    · We can’t use interactive applications;
    · And accessible websites have to boring!

    The fact is that your site can be the most fabulous and best looking website in the world, and you can use many of the above technologies while achieving a high level of website accessibility compliance. There’s no need to make too many website design compromises. Just make sure that your site is tested thoroughly, using both manual and automated testing methodologies, and by making alternatives available like [NOSCRIPT] tags; that is if you choose to use JavaScript. So there’s no longer excuse for having a well designed site that is simply inaccessible and useable.

    By Graham Jarvis
    Editor and Media Services Consultant
    Email: editor@cimtech.org

    20th April 2005

  • Dorset County Council is getting the most out its resources by moving its ‘customers’ to the web. Therefore it is viewed as essential to make sure that its website not only performs well, in terms of speed and the provision of relevant content, but that it is also is fully website accessibility compliant.

    Martin Bottomley, the council’s e-communications manager, feels that this includes meeting eGMS standards. What are the benefits for council websites? Being eGMS compliant improves the “sharing of information between government websites. This makes it easier for users to find the content that is most relevant to them.”

    Meanwhile, Ian Dunmore of Public Sector Forums feels that the public sector is at last showing its private counterpart a thing or two about good website accessibility and performance practice, and SiteMorse’s league tables – welcomed by some but not by all, are seen as a means of demonstrating both accessibility and, to a degree, website performance.

    By Graham Jarvis
    Editor and Media Services Consultant
    Email: editor@cimtech.org

  • The new Publicly Available Specification (PAS 78) for accessible website content design and development will fill a void created by a lack of clarity within the Disability Discrimination Act, which seems to allow everyone to make up their own interpretation of what is an accessible website. This legislation fails to make the W3C’s guidelines into a stringent standard, and this has led to much misinterpretation, many misunderstandings and even complacency in some cases.

    “The Act requires organisations to take ‘reasonable steps’ to ensure their sites are accessible. This is obviously something that can only be tested in law and ‘reasonable’ is a vague term,” comments Ian Dunmore of the Public Sector Forums, who then adds:  “However, the DRC recently commissioned the British Standards Institution to create a PAS (Publicly Available Specification) which should help those procuring websites to understand better how to make their sites accessible and thus take the ‘reasonable’ steps the Act requires.”

    No-one as yet has been taken to court for failing compliance in the UK, but the new British Standard Institution’s PAS 78 should at least create more consensus on what constitutes an accessible website. It should also motivate those who’ve yet to realise their legal, ethical, organisational and commercial obligations to become fully website accessibility compliant. The establishment of a Steering Group should, providing it includes all of the top experts and providers of website accessibility solutions, also herald a new dawn of collaboration.

    The DRC’s initiative, perhaps, represents a ‘carrot’ approach to increasing and educating organisations about the imperative of compliance. However, research suggests that maybe there also needs to be a ‘stick’ approach to increase the uptake of compliance and to reduce such complacency. These organisations should realise that disabled users represent a significant customer-base and so they should not be ignored, particularly as there are a number of marketing opportunities to be gained from them, which can have benefits for both public and private organisations.

    Britannia Building Society is a fine example of good and ethical practice in this particular area, having risen from the bottom of the SiteMorse league table to the number one spot after taking significant steps to improve its website’s accessibility. Britannia’s website manager, Linda Mellor, explains why accessibility is so important to her company:

    “As an organisation, Britannia has a commitment to being ethically and socially responsible, so we want to ensure that it is easy for all of our customers to do business with us online, regardless to the type of technology that they are using as well as their ability. We are achieving this using a combination of automated and manual testing for accessibility.”

    PAS 78 is not a full British Standard, but it is quicker to introduce. It will be introduced in the autumn of 2005, whereas a full British Standard could take several years to develop and introduce into the market. The other benefit of this approach, explains the DRC, is that it can be regularly updated. In fact it will be updated every two years.

    A DRC commissioned research study into 1,000 UK websites and accessibility testing by City University shows that the PAS 78 should potentially fill a gap: 81% of the tested websites failed to meet even the most basic criteria (Priority 1 A), and disabled users were recruited as part of the assessments. The research shows that 97% of most large organisations are aware of their legal duties to achieve the basic levels of compliance, but for some reason there is no evidence of any attempt to meet such standards. Around 68% of these, according to the DRC’s report, “The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People’, claimed to take accessibility into account.

    It is important to stress that the DRC and other organisations should not dismiss automated testing as being part of a myth about website accessibility or accuse it of creating confusion. The truth is that automated testing should be backed up and complemented by a variety of manual and usability tests to make sure that website accessibility can be achieved to the highest levels possible, or at least to the minimum standards of compliance.  PAS 78 is an important way forward to establishing a benchmark for all, and one that will benefits all users of the web.

    By Graham Jarvis
    Editor and Media Services Consultant
    Email: editor@cimtech.org

  • Nottingham-based e-Government Standards Body consultant on website accessibility of EIBS, Matt Gemmell, provides some useful tips for establishing best practices in this area in his presentation, ‘Guidelines for creating attractive, accessible and useable websites’. He also provides some pointers into local government websites, and perhaps others within the commercial sector, can be both accessible and useable.

    He comments: "Attractive, accessible and useable websites combine three key elements; Design, Technology and Content. Technology refers to the underlying code such as XHTML, CSS and metadata, and SiteMorse enables organisations to automatically ensure this element is fully compliant and accessible.”

    “Authors are then freed to focus on Design and Content, the more subjective and time consuming areas of building great websites. An automated testing tool like SiteMorse should always be part of the effective website manager’s toolkit, and it’s worth noting that the more issues SiteMorse identifies the more useful it is being."

    First of all he sets out the priorities for local authorities, which include:

    • Delivering online services that encourage new visitors, enticing them to return again;
    • The need for website to be visually appealing and more interactive;
      The need, with consideration to the Disability Discrimination Act, to attract and retain the widest possible audience;
    • The need to meet the wide variety of guidelines for using the latest technologies and for achieving, at least, the minimum if not the highest level of website accessibility compliance;
    • The need to manage limited resources and conflicting priorities.

    Matt believes there are quite a few misconceptions about how you can design both a useable and fully accessible website. He suggests that many people do not think it is possible to achieve AAA compliance; that they think that accessible websites have to be dull and boring, and that they believe you can’t implement a wide variety of technologies that provide a greater level of interactivity and multimedia content. Thankfully, you can have multimedia content, be more interactive, use JavaScript and DHTML; that is so long as you provide and alternative to the website user.  So your site can look good without being dulled down.

    In that case, you may ask, what entails good website design? Firstly, it will meet your audiences usability and accessibility requirements; secondly, the interface will be simple and intuitive; thirdly, you need to maintain a level of consistency; fourthly, you need to manage the site effectively to encourage new and repeated visits; fifthly, you should make mundane tasks more pleasant and improve the communication with your audience.

    The design criteria will include:

    • Corporate branding guidelines;
    • Audience (usability) and access devices;
    • Aesthetic appeal;
    • Building block in terms of shape, colour and features.

    The site layout should consider how the users will scan each web page, whether tables will be used or cascading style sheets (CSS), the positioning and the spacing of the each item, resizing and reshaping factors, and how you can make the navigation of the site easy to use. There in fact needs to be a balance between the users and the website owners in terms of structure and the types of content.

    Matt suggests that you should use large blocks for information, ensure that there are clear labels and that colour schemes are used effectively. Colours should be limited, for example, and they should provide a good level of contrast. He advises that colour shouldn’t be mixed within the same block, and it isn’t necessary to use colours to differentiate between information zones.

    There must also be some consideration about how you present text within a website: the use of font types, the sizing and resizing of fonts and headers. Links should be consistent in terms of their look at feel. Colours can be used, but they shouldn’t be used in a confusing manner. While photographic content should be used sparingly and in a small size, in order to avoid slowing download times.

    Automated testing, like that offered by SiteMorse – the leading website testing and monitoring company, can speed up the website accessibility testing process; saving organisations time and money. Matt is right when he says that it is your duty to provide, at the very least, a basic level of website accessibility. Yet until the web accessibility guidelines become legally enforced and clear standards, the whole area is still open to some sort of interpretation.

    By Graham Jarvis
    Editor and Media Services Consultant
    Email: editor@cimtech.org

    20th April 2005

  • Cost-cutting for the sake of it is out, and profit through long-term strategic marketing is back in the driving seat. That’s the view of Graham Ede, the refreshingly frank managing director of The Ion Group, which was established in 1995 after a visit in 1994 to an American company, the Unique Prospecting System; the inspiration behind his company’s ethics and philosophy, which reflect a more commonsense and positive approach to customer-centric marketing. The backbone of his strategic thinking lies in his statement that: “Nicheness is good, volume isn’t!”

    The essence of his company’s philosophy and overall opinions, which parallel many of the views of the Chartered Institute of Marketing’s Technology group and to a certain extent the CIM’s own Marketing Effectiveness campaign, is outlined in the company’s mission statement: “Our aim is to become the UK’s leading independent, contact centre and fulfilment service provider. The success of the company will be gauged by our clients’ perception of the service they receive – and not our perception of the service we deliver.”

    The Ion Group does not strive to be like Sitel, which focuses much on short-term and high volume campaigns. Ede believes that small is definitely more beautiful, more flexible and potentially more profitable. The type of clients he prefers are those like Proton Cars and Caribbean Cruises. The firm prefers administrative accounts to large transactional clients like the Abbey would be, although working with their sub-brands is not ruled out. The latter are more likely to be interested in a longer-term client, customer and strategic marketing approach than their larger brethren. This entails the development of a true partnership where all of the parties play a vital role.

    In fact, he says, being a flea on the back of an elephant can sometimes be a good thing because you gain more business from the elephant’s clients and provide them with a longer-lasting partnership. While contact centres like Sitel may command and boast more turnover and capture the larger projects in comparison, they have one major flaw that is making them chase their tails. It’s almost like a syndrome, which Ede refers to as the “Churn and Burn cycle.”

    Part of the parcel is their perceived need to cut costs for themselves, rather than to provide a good customer experience.  He refers to them as being so unfriendly to the customer, whether they are working within the mobile phone sector or whatever, with an inflexible approach to Service Level Agreements, which often provides the customer with only about 2 minutes before he or she is cut off (whether or not his or her enquiry has been answered). Ede argues that this and the poor use of technology, particularly CRM and IVR systems, is giving the call centre industry a bad name. The outsourcing of call centres to India, although welcomed as competition, is seen as another blotch on the industry’s reputation.

    The large volume call and contact centres may beg to differ with his opinions. Yet keeping existing customers and the correct implementation of information technology is a far cheaper bet than the alternatives. A sole focus on an existing customer-base is, however, not always a good idea. Ede rightly says that Churn is not necessary in most cases, because you can profit by developing rapport with both your clients and their customers. So since it started business in 1994 as Call Back UK Ltd and became the Ion Group in the year 2000, it has adopted a long-term strategy. This focuses predominantly on both customer acquisition and retention.  The firm also handles a small amount of customer service enquiries.

    The benefits of this strategy, which takes care of the needs of both dealers and clients within the automotive sector (70% of the Ion Group’s clients fall within this sector, much due to the knowledge and experience of Graham Ede) which are shown by their partnerships with their clients. For example: Audi has been a client since 1995, Land Rover has been a client of the Ops Room (which was acquired by the Moonriver Group in November 2002) for 14 years. Moonriver recently acquired and merged with the Ion Group. The Ion Group has also had a 5-year relationship with Nissan. Harley Davidson is another major client for whom the Ion Group provides a multiplicity of services outside of the US, and in a number of languages (the Group handles 70,000 of its club members). Fiat has recently joined the stable of clients.

    In total the Ion Group works with 30 international companies, many of whom are provided with dedicated campaign teams. For those smaller clients who can’t afford such a dedicated service, call centre staff are cross-trained to help to reduce the human resources’ costs.

    So successful are the inherent strategies that they have led to a 15% increase in personnel numbers over the last two years. The firm has relocated to larger premises too, “with the addition of a fulfilment arm” its website says, “in Isleworth to complement the main business in Twickenham.” The company has also published some interesting research into the industry containing a sample of 1000 companies in the banking, insurance, automotive, retail, hotel & leisure and travel sectors to show the current demand for contact centre services.

    The key findings include:

    • Outbound customer service calls ranked third most important contact centre service (6.62 out of a possible score of 10);
    • Outbound sales/lead generation was ranked only as the sixth most important service (6.16);
    • Email/web response handling was cited as the fourth most important service (6.55);
    • Live call handling is the top priority (8.1);
    • Automated call handling ranked seventh (4.96);
    • Despite the recent publicity surrounding offshore services, respondents showed comparatively little interest with the total score of 2.71 out of 10.
      For further details please read: ‘Call centres focus on improving customer profitability, by the European Centre for Customer Strategies’

    The company’s research, whether or not involving the above findings, has led to a new approach. One of the problems of being a niche player is that your customer or client-base can be very narrow and therefore more risky. The Ion Group nearly found itself at saturation point, so it looked at 5 vertical markets ranging from the I.T to the automotive sectors. This, he says, protects the group by providing a broader range of clients and allows the firm to escape from being pigeon-holed as only able to service outbound campaigns. Although the company aims to grow and prosper, it does not wish to become a giant. It currently seats about 200 plus agents, not reaching the scales of its larger competitors.

    Ede stresses the need to keep an eye on the competition. His research revealed that customers are being poorly treated by many a call or contact centre. Subsequently, he allows his agents to chat with customers to provide a warmer experience of the service. This he hopes will overcome many of the usual objections that arise in call centres across the land, and the end result should be more sales by adding value to the customers’ experiences. Warm-calling is also preferred to its chillier counterpart. This all shows a clear difference in approach to the other contact centres who watch every second or minute that an agent talks to a customer, often leaving thoughts of good customers service out of the picture. SLAs are one thing, but happy customers are far more profitable in the long run.

    Ede’s ultimate message and one that should become an industry motto is: “If it is not relevant to the customer, then don’t do it!” There is, for example, no point in encouraging a poor old lady to call unwittingly in for her Aries horoscope, and then sending her an £80 phone bill for the 10-20 minute experience. This only does harm to the reputation of the industry as a whole, as Ede rightly points out. So he welcomes legislation against bad practice, and thinks that ICSTIS should do more to combat it. However, he is also worried by the emergence of the Telephone Preference Service for business, which could stop businesses from communicating. Without the ability to communicate with potential customers, particularly other businesses, it could become impossible to find new clients.  A balance has to be struck between good practice, and the needs of each party involved in the sales’ process.

    Lastly, he also fears that, while we talk so much about creating customer loyalty to our brands, the ‘burn and churn’ scenario and other factors are in fact creating, “an environment out there that isn’t loyal.” Ede believes, while insisting that firms can still create loyal customers by getting away from this negative syndrome, that loyalty has become a by-word of the 1960s. Indeed it is becoming harder to retain customers because there are so many companies, and particularly the banks, encouraging us to be disloyal as a direct result of their own promotional strategies, which are supposed to attract new business. Instead they encourage churn. Customers are also more savvy, and with more choice available to them they could easily move aside to welcome your competitors if you get things wrong.

    As a result of their larger competitors’ mistakes, the Ion Group hopes to pick up where they left off. By differentiating itself and interacting in a professional and warmer manner with both its clients and their customers, the Ion Group has found itself a positive and potentially profitable way forward. Like Graham Ede says, much of what his company is doing is commonsense and basic strategic marketing. There are too many out there who still think the client rather than the customer is king. Surely, it’s time for a change in focus, more action and less of those platitudes about customer-centricity?

    By Graham Jarvis, 13th September 2004

    Tel: +44 (0)776 682 3644

     

  • Be a ‘thought-leader’ to gain competitive advantage

    Type into Google, MSN or any other search engine, the words ‘Sarbanes Oxley and sales’ and you are more likely to be faced with a lot hot air and negativity about the Act, which came into force in 2002. It is likely to even have an impact on European companies too. Costs are associated with even the most positive aspects of life, so why focus on them?

    Good corporate governance is good for your business. If you are adding value to your business and to all of your stakeholders, including customers, then whatever you do to make sure that you run your business ethically and effectively can only in the long run assist you in increasing sales. There are too many large businesses, many of whom are even household names, who focus on costs alone, and yet they don’t quite so often mention how good corporate governance can help you or even themselves to boost sales.

    Terry Kendrick, from the School of Management at the University of East Anglia explains why the Act can and should be seen more as an opportunity than a business threat or an expensive and an additional administrative hurdle:

    “Good corporate governance is an opportunity to show investors that the future is secure and that their money is safe.  With increased openness and transparency a company can show that its customer-base is not at significant risk, and that where risks do exist these are being managed well.   Risk-aware sales and marketing processes would seem to be an important element in managing potentially uncertain income streams, providing early warnings to trigger contingency plans. A well managed income stream is a source of comfort to investors!” 

    “Poor corporate governance is a source of reputational risk which can directly affect your brand which, in turn, is a clear source of company value.  This risk to your brand from poor corporate governance is to be found amongst all stakeholder groups, not just market analysts and investors.  Would you, for instance, as a partner in a strategic alliance feel comfortable having your brand potentially contaminated by a partner’s poor corporate governance record or by a journalist exposing non-compliance with acceptable business practices?”

    What is the primary function of a business? The goal is to make money, yet this cannot be achieved without adding value through a joined-up sales and marketing process. Marketing leads the charge, but it is up to the salesforce to deliver the appropriate message in the right way, to increase sales and value. In the public sector, the augmentation of sales is not as important, but these organisations must still deliver according to public policy requirements. With taxpayers being increasingly seen as customers in their own right, one could argue that the same principles still apply: targets must be met and value must be created.

    “Without sales, organisations cannot survive”, argues Andrew Dugdale – director of Intellectual Capital Development Ltd (ICDL) and a member of the Marketing and Sales’ Standards Setting Body (MSSSB).  He adds: “Sales should not therefore be viewed simply as a necessary business function, alongside marketing, operations, finance and other departments. It is fundamental to the delivery of the corporate mission and must therefore inform every other area of the business.”

    Beth Rogers, Research Director at the Institute of Sales and Marketing Management and a lecturer at Portsmouth Business School, adds: “Sales has not been known for thought-leadership, but as the frontline in meeting customer reaction to the company’s products and services, sales should contribute to corporate thinking.  Sales managers need to be standard bearers for sales as a profession, by reflecting on and promoting what the sales’ function contributes to the long-term growth of the company as well as short-term revenue.”

    While I’ve also heard complaints about the costs associated with SOX compliance, there’s another false belief or negativity that needs to be tackled. Some consultants say that value is just a buzzword, and so it is meaningless. Rogers explains:

    “Value is one of those wonderfully vague English words that can accommodate all kinds of perceptions, including "cheap"!  I normally describe it in B2B sales as reducing hassle for the customer. If a purchasing decision-maker receives a proposal from a supplier that would relieve them from some irritation or stress in their job, then they will probably perceive value.  The vast majority of purchasers I have interviewed over the years prefer suppliers who make things easy – usually by following a process excellence and innovation.”

    The ‘thought-leaders’ at ICDL, like Dugdale, argue that value should be more recognised as the founding concept behind any business. “Where no value exists, no trade can take place and no businesses can exist”, he says. His argument is as follows:

    · All value is perceived value; it is derived from combinations of effort, scarcity and desirability. Morgan cars are valuable because they take a lot of effort to build, there are not many available and they are highly sought after by certain groups of car buyers.

    · The role of sales is to enhance the desirability aspects of value. Where all products are priced the same and are equally available, desirability is the only effective differentiator. Sales people must be able to demonstrate that their products or services provide greater value than a competitor’s offerings. This type of Value is the source of competitive advantage.

    · The only proposition that has value to a business is one that enables it to demonstrate higher value to its own customers, thereby giving it Competitive Advantage.

    So how do you create value? By a process of alignment, says Dugdale; “A business that can help a customer build sales to its own customers has achieved a high level of alignment between its capabilities and the needs of the customer. This alignment is the point at which value is created.” Furthermore by gaining more control over your sales’ process, perhaps using ICDL’s tools, you can attain a high level of alignment between customer needs and business offerings. Linked to an audit trail, this will enable you to prevent relationship and brand-damaging fraud, and the mis-selling of your products and services.

    Alignment and the adoption or the creation of audit trails, on the other hand, lead to more sustainable and profitable relationships. As a manager you would be in a positive to establish best practices, more effective benchmarks for good corporate governance with the evidence to back up any claims about your own activities and those of your salespeople.

    If you are based in Europe, or even in the rest of the world, you might wonder why you need to be Sarbanes-Oxley compliant. Well, the US economy is the driving force behind what happens to the rest of us, particularly subsidiaries or the suppliers of US companies based around the world. 

    By being a thought-leader you can create more value and a competitive advantage. As a result of you changing your thinking, others – including your competitors – will look at your company as one that is potentially establishing a new industry benchmark. So what is a though-leader? Rogers explains:

    “Thought leadership is being ahead of the market – thinking and talking now about what we will all be doing in 3-5 years. It is natural to assume that companies who are thought-leaders are also going to be first in developing products and services to deliver competitive advantage to their customers. Innovation is not just about new products, it involves new ways of doing business, reducing costs, improving quality of the work environment and more. A company that encourages the expression and circulation of ideas will generate the intellectual property to claim thought-leadership.”

    ICDL, she says, are thought-leaders because they “have identified the importance of corporate governance and developed a way of helping their customers to be compliant.  Not all companies are currently aware of the implications of Sarbanes-Oxley, so ICDL is leading thought on this.” In parallel to ICDL, Portsmouth Business School, the Institute of Sales and Marketing Management, and the University of East Anglia’s forthcoming Centre for Marketing and Risk are developing programmes to cover the management of corporate governance and risk.

    By managing risks and preventing the mismanagement of your company and its business processes, you will be able to increase your sales and your Return on Assets Employed. Corporate governance provides your customers with more transparency and therefore creates a new behavioural pattern that can only prove beneficial to all of those concerned. Costs? Yes they may increase in the short-term, but in the long-term these may seem negligible against the benefits of managing your business more effectively and more efficiently, with the potential for lowering costs over time. The professionalism of your company and staff will enable you to keep your SOX by increasing your sales. So are you a thought-leader? With good corporate governance, you could be and envied for it.

    By Graham Jarvis
    editor@cimtech.org
    Editor – CIMTech International

    24th November 2004

    About ICDL

    ICDL stands for Intellectual Capital Development Limited. It is a name that reflects directly upon our two principal activities. The first is the application of fresh thinking to our clients’ sales and marketing strategies. The second is the translation of our ideas into practical, flexible tools that can be applied by our clients to their own unique business challenges.
    Our tools and development programmes have been adopted by global organisations, such as BT Syntegra and Carillion. They are ideally suited to the delivery of the audit trailing and management accountability specified by rulings on corporate responsibility, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley ERM Draft Legislation in the USA. In addition, they can serve as practical replacements for sales training and they can even link to customer relationship management solutions such as Oracle, Onyx and ACT.

    ICDL was established in 2000 to build tools, processes and events that drive forward sales productivity. Andrew Dugdale whose career spans 22 years in global sales established the company. He is Vice Chairman of the Royal Counties branch of the Chartered Institute of Marketing and sits on the MSSSB (Marketing and Sales Standards Setting Body) a government-sponsored steering group, looking at setting future standards for excellence in sales and marketing.
    DOWNLOAD BROCHURE (Adobe Acrobat file)

    About Terry Kendrick

    Terry Kendrick has been a business consultant since 1987, initially in information sources and management and subsequently in marketing planning.   Since 1987 he has worked on marketing planning and CRM projects for over fifty organisations in a wide range of manufacturing, consumer and services marketplaces in seventeen different countries
    Terry has published business-to-business and academic papers on customer relationship management and risk management in marketing.  Other publications include an executive briefing for Gee/ Sweet & Maxwell on strategic marketing planning and risk.  He has contributed lectures on strategic risk management, consultancy skills, organisational change and research methods as part of the MBA programme at the University of East Anglia.  He has also presented sessions for Cranfield School of Management, the University of Strathclyde and the Mediterranean Institute of Management in Cyprus.

    In addition to general strategic marketing planning and research expertise Terry has a particular interest in competitive intelligence (CI) and risk management.   He has written for the worldwide Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) and runs CI and risk management workshops for companies and other organisations.   He is currently researching the application of risk management tools and techniques to strategic marketing planning.

    About the ISMM

    The Institute of Sales & Marketing Management (ISMM) is the UK’s only professional body for salespeople. Founded in 1966 to promote standards of excellence in sales and sales management and to enhance the status and profile of sales as a profession, the ISMM has been the authoritative voice of selling and the custodian of sales standards, ethics and best practice for over 35 years.

    The ISMM is also responsible for establishing benchmarks of professionalism in sales and is the only membership body accredited by the Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (QCA) to award nationally-recognised qualifications in selling and sales management.

    ISMM members are drawn from every sector of industry and commerce. From those just embarking upon a sales career through to senior and experienced sales managers and directors, they share a commitment to upholding the standards of professionalism and integrity that are the hallmarks of sales success.

    About Beth Rogers

    Beth Rogers BA MBA DipM FInstSMM FCIM is Programme Manager of the MA Sales Management at Portsmouth Business School and Research Director of the Institute of Sales and Marketing Management.
    Beth is a popular speaker and writer on KAM. She is co-author of “Key Customers – how to manage them profitably” and “Key Account Management – learning from supplier and customer perspectives.” More recently, she has authored several articles on sales management, key account management and customer relationship management.

    Beth’s early career was spent with IBM, where she undertook a variety of roles, including managing IBM’s relationships with Business Partners in the manufacturing sector, and designing the Annual Software Growth Offering for key accounts. She was then a consultant and Visiting Fellow at Cranfield, where she pioneered the first key account management research project at the School of Management and ran successful programmes for clients including Alcan and Adtranz.

    She is a member of the sales steering group of the Marketing and Sales Standards Setting Body of the UK and serves on the Ethical Committee of Standard Life.

    About CIMTech

    CIMTech is a voluntary organisation, which exists to promote the adoption of marketing technologies by business, and best practice in the commercialisation of technology companies. The monthly Newsletter aims to be an inspirational and informative conduit for communication from experts over a range of relevant topics so practising Marketers from all backgrounds can learn, save time and make money on a continual basis facilitated by a trusted source. For info visit our website…

  • What is wrong with traditional business thinking? Graham Jarvis, Editor of the Chartered Institute of Marketing’s Technology group – CIMTech International – explains why businesses should become thought-leaders, focus less on efficiencies and more on strategic effectiveness to attain and sustain a competitive advantage by managing total marketing.

    Every business of every kind has issues to deal with on a daily basis. It’s quite easy to get bogged down by them and lose focus on what business really is about: making money by delivering to customers what they demand; whether we are in the B2B or the B2C arena, the principle still remains the same.  So human nature can often make us focus on the more negative and pointless aspects of life and business. The result is that traditional business thinking concentrates upon ‘easy’ aspects of measurable benefit – creating more and more efficiencies, that entails rationalising costs whenever possible and even when it is the last thing you should do.

    The customer, even with regards to the outsourcing craze, seems to have been left behind. Marketers, too, don’t have the respect they need to drive their businesses forward for the benefit of all stakeholders, which include investors and more importantly customers. People with financial backgrounds dominate the boardrooms of the world; they drive the show for short-term profit, and often with little regard to marketing effectiveness. Marketing is too often equated with marcomms, and not seen as the most vital long-term strategic tool and asset that a company can ever possess. Marketers need to therefore begin to get out of their silos and fight for the rightful place around the board table: they should be drivers for good corporate governance and best practice right across the enterprise.

    Total Marketing means be more positive!

    Total marketing differs from traditional though because it is more holistic and positive in its approach. There’s no cutting off one of David Beckham’s legs so that he is more efficient, particularly to the extent that he wouldn’t be able to run or score goals. If you are an England fan, you therefore hope that he is going to be more and more effective with each match. He’s a great footballer already, but everyone must continually go through a process of ongoing improvement (POOGI). Yet you don’t change what isn’t broken. So you prioritise and change only what will provide your company with significant improvement to your bottom-line benefits.
    Total marketing is also demand-driven and so there’s no need to increase productivity for the sake of it. Everything you do must match, reflect and adapt to meet customer demand; the customers’ needs, wants and desires.

    By delivering more effectively to the customer, and by focusing on the core issues that limit and maximise your business performance, you will be able to deliver significantly better results than if you focus solely on cost-cutting. By meeting and not exceeding demand, you will be able to reduce your costs right across the supply and value chain for the benefit of all stakeholders. Nick Rawls, Peoplesoft’s Product Marketing Director for Enterprise One, very much supported this view, arguing that most businesses outsource because they do not wish to sort out and work on their core issues. Their driver: blind efficiencies. So they outsource from Mexico, to India, to Poland and then they find there are no more costs to cut, and that their business performance has not necessarily improved.

    Innovation is vital

    I also agree with Andrew Dugdale of ICDL and David Hood, CIMTech’s chair. Marketers should be more innovative (and live perhaps in Ansoff’s fourth quadrant), accept more accountability, and work more collaboratively with other departments within their companies. The imperative of which is a customer-focus; the delivery of true customer-centricity. Part of this may include a reappraisal of the traditional 4 Ps of the marketing mix, to include people and processes, technologies, and other elements to become the 10 Ps.

    So many Customer Relationship Management implementations failed, because the managers responsible for such projects did not know how to make the systems work effectively for themselves or their customers (Bearing in mind though that CRM is usually equated to a computer process rather than true customer anything). The entire concept, over which very few can reach a conclusive agreement about its definition, is particularly flawed because it leaves the customer out in the cold. No longer does the customer remain king. They’ve been routed by internally focused processes and self-serving procedures. Yet many organisations, particularly the banks, still claim to be customer-centric. So even when you innovate the delivery and data capture processes with new technologies, you must always make sure that whatever you do improves the customers’ experience.

    Graham Ede of the Ion Group takes an innovative approach to contact centre management, for example because total marketing relies upon using the right metrics and in the right way. Too many call and contact centres focus on the wrong means of measuring agent performance. Agents are quite often given just two minutes to answer each call they take, because that will increase – misleadingly I add – the performance of that agent, although increasing his or her ability to get a bonus.

    However, customers end up feeling pushed around and not welcomed. So the Ion Group has adopted a truly customer-centric philosophy by focusing on improving the customers’ experience, measuring the reduction in churn and the creation of lifetime value through extended long-term customer relationships. Here customers can chat with the staff, because this may entice them to buy more products and services. As a result, each party should be able to profit.

    By Graham Jarvis,

    Editor and ROI Spokesman of CIMTech International, and Media Services Consultant
    Mobile: +44 (0)776 682 3644

    Additional Comment:

    Total Marketing Tips From Peoplesoft’s Nick Rawls· Address your core issues first;· Only outsource where it makes sense;· Involve your suppliers, create transparent and collaborative processes where each stakeholder can profit, perhaps using technology as the linkage;

    • Don’t just take software company’s view of where you should be going, because this matters least of all;
    • Be demand-driven, because the cost-driven model is wrong;· Beware that the forecasting model can mean that you don’t the offering your customers really want, and it can increase your costs;
    • What really matters is your internal management and the assessment of your competitive landscape, and where your business model is going· Use the spur of competition to your advantage through commercial collaborations.

     

  • UK Companies selling financial products on the Internet have one major problem: they have a legal duty to provide detailed information) about their offerings; such as mortgages, loans and so forth, but it is very difficult for search engines to provide all of the required information in their search results (e.g. disclaimers and terms and conditions.

    Therefore Linda Mellor, the website manager of Britannia Building Society – which has led the banks and building league table since January 2005 after rising from near the bottom over the last year – welcomes the opportunity to use a keyword tool, which can help financial companies like her own to solve this problem. The tool helps to optimise the keyword search capability, and therefore it helps customers or potential customers to find this essential information.

    “Britannia’s aim is to be a model of compliance and our interpretation of Mortgage Conduct of Business Regulations, for example, is that the search listing is a complete advert.  Therefore if it is promoting mortgages in a certain way, full legals needs to be on the listing – clearly this does sometimes make it rather challenging!” She comments.

    SiteMorse’s Saf Hulou talks about how the tool can help companies like Britannia:

    “Our product has a function whereby it can search an entire website for certain strings of words, for example, ‘green apples’ or ‘legal disclaimer’. This helps website developers to highlight sections of their site for further checking. For example, if they have recently changed their legal disclaimer, they can search for some of the text in order to ensure that the old has been replaced, throughout the site. This feature can also be applied to old company logos (etc.) that may still crop up on obscure parts of sites that may not have been properly checked.”

    Britannia is also committed to continually improving the accessibility of its website for all users, particularly the disabled. The building society sees it as its legal, ethical and commercial imperative to ensure that anyone can buy the building society’s financial products online. So it uses SiteMorse’s reports on a daily basis to keep its website in good shape, and the automated nature of the testing makes certain that issues can be uncovered and solved very quickly. The company has had to re-work its entire website, re-coded its templates to the meet the W3C standards in order to achieve the number one spot.

    Mellor welcomes the SiteMorse league tables too. She says that it helps her and her colleagues to see how they are performing against the building society’s competitors. The firm’s approach, based on its culture of Corporate Social Responsibility, and its standing in the league tables provides something very positive to shout out about. She believes that the method of testing behind the table is very fair: “As SiteMorse applies the same technical tests to all sites, there’s a level playing field and this establishes a benchmark.”

    Talking about access for the disabled and other users she says, “Disabled customers are an important part of our marketplace. We work within the Employers’ Network on Disability (ENOD) to ensure that we are at the forefront of best practice and are authorised to use the ‘Two ticks’ symbol positive about disability.”

    “We have invested substantial sums in the branch network over the past few years to improve access into and around our branches. Access to our services is, of course, not just a premises issue – primarily it is about provision of the right customer service for the individual.  There are a wide variety of disabilities and customer will have different needs.”

    So how important is website accessibility compliance?

    “To us as an organisation” she says, “it is very important and now we have reached Level A compliance, we’ll continue to work to improve our site.  We now have an Accessibility Policy governing new developments on our site – it’s part of our commitments to be socially responsible, put our customers first, and be easy to do business with. The online industry should recognise that, because the number of disabled people using the Internet is significant. The more accessible you make your site, the more likely you are to tap into that market.”

    Mellor adds: “Manual and automated testing should go hand in hand.  We’ve got the coding right, and SiteMorse reports help us to ensure we maintain the standards, but we also need to make sure that the site is useable and this is being done through manual testing. Automated testing can identify errors more quickly, while the manual testing identifies the usability issues that automated tests may not pick up and that may be major issues for people using assistive technology.”

    “The SiteMorse reports give us a quick insight into where the errors are; enabling us to act very quickly to correct any problems. It’s a very reasonably priced service, which gives us reports that are easy to understand, easy to use and which identify the specific issues we need to address.”

    She thinks, quite rightly, that there is a reputational risk if organisations elect to ignore and be complacent about their obligations to be website accessibility compliant. Some private companies in the financial sector, it has been suggested by other sources, are deliberately ignoring this issue. It’s not surprising though, because no legal action has been taken as yet in the UK by the Disability Rights Commission to enforce the Disability Discrimination Act. Therefore these firms are perhaps taking a calculated financial and commercial risk, but one that could both be damaging to themselves and to the image of the industry as a whole.

    “The DRC”, she explains, “obviously could be using this type of monitoring to help name and shame companies into being compliant – it could be that only naming and shaming will get some organisations to move on this.” The DRC is taking a softer approach, which includes the introduction of a new standard, PAS 78, and the establishment of a website accessibility Steering Group. SiteMorse welcomes this initiative, but there is still some potential for organisations to continue to be website accessibility complacent.

    Phil Lock of Leeds and Holbeck agrees that the financial sector is being complacent: ”We’ve seen that in the past when we’ve spoken to competitors about it. I appreciate there aren’t a strict set of guidelines to help anyone, which makes things difficult. One thing that’s becoming clear, however, is that even the most ignorant will have to seriously address accessibility in the next six months or so – and we just want to make sure that we aren’t one of those that gets named or shamed by the powers that be.”

    Britannia feels that training is an important part of making sure that website accessibility stays or is moved to the top of the agenda, helping staff to fully understand its commercial and organisational benefits, including the fact that it helps with search engine optimisation, as well as making personnel aware of the legal obligations for maintaining compliant websites. The building society has therefore enhanced its employee knowledge through a series of 6 monthly training sessions over the past two years. Mellor says that the subsequent training notes assist staff to enhance the customer-experience.

    She concludes: “We can therefore be confident” she feels, “that Britannia is well positioned in terms of the legislation and is focused on putting our customers first positions us well ahead of many of our competitors.  However, best practice in this area does move forward and we are always looking for areas in which we can improve.” This positive and constructive attitude should ensure that her company’s position remains at the top of SiteMorse’s league table.

    By Graham Jarvis
    Freelance Editor, Senior Journalist, and P.R. Consultant
    Email: gajarvis@media-insert.com

  • "SiteMorse has helped to give us a measure of our overall performance against similar companies in the FTSE; those reports are very useful and we can compare ourselves with other e-commerce sites. We have improved our website’s download speeds, and eliminated the errors; so the quality of the site since we first looked at it a year ago is much improved."

    BA.com, Chris Carmichael, Technical Editor

Media-Insert Communications

Contact

Designed with WordPress